Human intelligence requires both correctness and robustness, with the former being foundational for the latter. In video understanding, correctness ensures the accurate interpretation of visual content, and robustness maintains consistent performance in challenging conditions. Despite advances in video large language models (video LLMs), existing benchmarks inadequately reflect the gap between these models and human intelligence in maintaining correctness and robustness in video interpretation. We introduce the Video Turing Test (Video-TT), a benchmark designed to assess if video LLMs can interpret real-world videos as effectively as humans.Video-TT differentiates between errors due to inadequate frame sampling and 1) genuine gaps in understanding complex visual narratives, and 2) evaluates robustness against natural adversarial questions. Video-TT comprises 1,000 YouTube Shorts videos, each with one open-ended question and four adversarial questions that probe visual and narrative complexity. Our evaluation shows a significant gap between video LLMs and human performance, underscoring the need for benchmarks like Video-TT to advance video understanding.